Monday, January 3, 2011

Appetite.

What is different in the way you see a tiger killing a deer in the forest and a tiger turned man-eater. For the first you would make excuses, and write sonnets on nature's glorious cycle, but, for the second, you would pull out the gun and make boots out of the skin. It is the same way we look at people around us. What is it that marks someone out as desperate, and someone else as just vivacious, or charming. The thing which turns someone from a lover, into a stalker, a murderer even. It twists all emotions, like a drug, making the colours sharper, the need stronger, turning it into a vacuum. Most importantly for female dynamics, it makes some women look like they are running behind men, while the same men would meet some women halfway, and then some.What is it about these women which makes them attractive to men, apart from the obvious reasons. Scarlett O'Hara, you see, was not beautiful, but men seldom realized it when caught by her charm...It then, does not belong to your face or figure, or your GPA, or couture. There has to be an explanation. It should not be just 'that special something'. Does that not defeat the whole purpose of having multi-million dollar industries made on the earlier hypothesis of beauty being skin deep? Or is it just the difference being starved and being healthily hungry?

No comments:

Post a Comment